<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only another 9,500 hours to go!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluehorizonweb.com/blog/2008/11/chess-improvement/only-another-9500-hours-to-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluehorizonweb.com/blog/2008/11/chess-improvement/only-another-9500-hours-to-go/</link>
	<description>The journey of a patzer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:20:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bluehorizonweb.com/blog/2008/11/chess-improvement/only-another-9500-hours-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluehorizonweb.com/blog/2008/11/chess-improvement/only-another-9500-hours-to-go/#comment-600</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone is disputing that we are talking about structured practice/study/analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone is disputing that we are talking about structured practice/study/analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.bluehorizonweb.com/blog/2008/11/chess-improvement/only-another-9500-hours-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluehorizonweb.com/blog/2008/11/chess-improvement/only-another-9500-hours-to-go/#comment-561</guid>
		<description>It is a common misunderstand of the hpothesis that it takes 10,000 hours to master a skill/field/endeavour  that the 10,000 hours is cumulaticve time spent in the activity.   It is not.  

It takes 10,000 hours of directed practice. Directed practice here is a technical term that means practice or study with a clearly defined goal, objective criteria to know if and when the goal is achieved, controlled repetitions to re-inforce the learning and so on.

Time spent playing or reading generally, but an an un-focussed way, may be enjoyable, and does lead to improvement, but nowhere near so efficiently as &quot;directed practice&quot;  It cannot count towards the 10,000 hours.

There is another flaw.  The studies on which this is based show that those people that attained a high level of performance (e.g. above grade 8 on a musical instrument, a 2300 Elo rating etc.) took, on average 10,000 hours of directed practice to get there.

What the studies ignore are those people that put in the same 10,000 hours but did not reach that level of performance.

So the 10,000 hours may be a NECESSARY condition (no-one- however talented, reaches those levels without doing the work) but it is not SUFFICIENT (you could do the work and still not reach the standard). We still do not know exactly what else you have to bring with you in the form of genetically endowed talent, motivation, and love of the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a common misunderstand of the hpothesis that it takes 10,000 hours to master a skill/field/endeavour  that the 10,000 hours is cumulaticve time spent in the activity.   It is not.  </p>
<p>It takes 10,000 hours of directed practice. Directed practice here is a technical term that means practice or study with a clearly defined goal, objective criteria to know if and when the goal is achieved, controlled repetitions to re-inforce the learning and so on.</p>
<p>Time spent playing or reading generally, but an an un-focussed way, may be enjoyable, and does lead to improvement, but nowhere near so efficiently as &#8220;directed practice&#8221;  It cannot count towards the 10,000 hours.</p>
<p>There is another flaw.  The studies on which this is based show that those people that attained a high level of performance (e.g. above grade 8 on a musical instrument, a 2300 Elo rating etc.) took, on average 10,000 hours of directed practice to get there.</p>
<p>What the studies ignore are those people that put in the same 10,000 hours but did not reach that level of performance.</p>
<p>So the 10,000 hours may be a NECESSARY condition (no-one- however talented, reaches those levels without doing the work) but it is not SUFFICIENT (you could do the work and still not reach the standard). We still do not know exactly what else you have to bring with you in the form of genetically endowed talent, motivation, and love of the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.bluehorizonweb.com/blog/2008/11/chess-improvement/only-another-9500-hours-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluehorizonweb.com/blog/2008/11/chess-improvement/only-another-9500-hours-to-go/#comment-355</guid>
		<description>I have even further to go, in that case ! but I doubt if that will stop me... If I&#039;m honest I will never reach the top ( or even near it ) in chess, but there again, its not my &quot;chosen discipline&quot;, in that it doesn&#039;t provide me with a living.

However, I do enjoy chess the more I understand what I am doing, so that must be my goal : understanding, rather than just rating points !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have even further to go, in that case ! but I doubt if that will stop me&#8230; If I&#8217;m honest I will never reach the top ( or even near it ) in chess, but there again, its not my &#8220;chosen discipline&#8221;, in that it doesn&#8217;t provide me with a living.</p>
<p>However, I do enjoy chess the more I understand what I am doing, so that must be my goal : understanding, rather than just rating points !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
